The Balrog Bridge

Stupidity is always a great form of entertainment....atleast in my opinion. Oh, and I'm not referring to being or pretending to be stupid to entertain others. I'm simply referring to people who are just.....dumb. It's hilarious. And I think, it's a problem. A limitation to the progress of human beings as a species. Imagine if every single person on the planet, was super smart, and served to achieve a unified goal to actually become a civilization so great, Nikolai Kardashev would go 'oh fuck'.

You mean mean person!

I think perhaps, if people in general were that useless to actually NOT contribute towards human progress, the whole sci-fi picture I'm seeing in my head won't come true for a very long time. However, I'm not saying that what I'm about to suggest is technologically achievable at the moment, but I'm just going to go ahead and say that if or when we would be able to accomplish such feats, we should go ahead and do it, and say 'fuck you ethics'.

So, let's start of with babies. I saw this movie once, called The Island with Ewan Mcgregor and Scarlett Johansson, where humans were cloned and given identities. Well of course until they break out and well you know.......shit happens since it's a movie. I'm not going to suggest cloning, since I don't want copies of the same people all over the place, no matter how smart they are. So, here's my suggestion. Let's grow babies in human incubators until they reach a certain stage, alter them genetically to suit certain jobs, and feed their brains information specifically designed to succeed at those certain jobs at a very young stage. Instant 'guywhosgonnabuildaspaceship'. Or something similar.

Ah, Scarlett, why are you so hot?

Now let's say at such an advanced stage of human civilization, we let the baby grow.....normally. High-school drop out, and 'would you like fries with that?' YOU HAD POTENTIAL! However, it does come down to freedom of choosing doesn't it? Well, how about we look at it this way. There can be many kinds of humans in the future. Half-synthetic ones, genetically superior humans, humans who are immune to all diseases and of course, Christians. How could I forget, right? (U MAD?) If humans can be created for specific purposes, I don't really think freedom to choose would become much of a problem. Why? Well, because you will be one of the smartest beings on the planet, and you were born to become great. Or would you rather be wondering why the customer didn't want onions with his burger?

Hey did you hear? Jimmy, the guy who was grown in an incubator
created pills to cure cancer. Oh and yes, a medium coke please.

Now onto human enhancement. I'm thinking this would be met with criticism from conservatives and the religious front altogether, in the future that is. 'But why would you alter your brain with synthetics or nano-technology or something because that's not how you were made!' The answer is simple. Assume your arms were augmented, and now, you could do work faster and easier than ever before. Assume you had the chance to become immune to all diseases and be constantly updated to counter new ones. Assume you could run faster, think better, and use all five of your senses a 100 times better than before. Why would emergency workers need rescue dogs when they themselves could hear or smell a human under all that rubble? If genetic engineering has limitations, augmenting humans at later stages of life would make you even better. Human progress would be faster than ever before. Sure, you may be half a 'terminator', but then again, always remember that you are better.

So doctor, this enhancement has wifi capabilities right?

In the end, yes, this is all not possible at the moment. However, when the time comes, I think humans should disregard ethics fully or to some extent, because I believe this is the next stage of evolution. Maybe this all would depend on how wealthy you are (repo men) or how much of a 'true' human you want to remain, but when it comes down to improving yourselves beyond your wildest imagination, I really don't think people should back down. Go for it. Create humans. Alter yourselves, because we have galaxies to travel to!

This was it. 5 years of gaming, countless battles, hundreds of decisions, shitloads of conversations, and traveling the entire galaxy came down to the final battle between Shepard and the reapers. The Mass Effect trilogy has been my favourite gaming series after Metal Gear, and it's without a doubt one of the greatest sci-fi stories ever told. Bioware, the developers were geniuses.


So how'd I get ready for the final game? I bought the Collectors Edition, and generally stayed away from anything which was a spoiler the week it came out. However, since I ordered the game from Ozgameshop, I had to wait another week before I could play since they were based in the UK. Now I realize that this was a mistake. Why? Because before I knew it, people had started talking about the Mass Effect 3 endings. It was the hot topic in the gaming industry. A retake movement had started, and was gaining a lot of support. However, I didn't want to know what the ending was. I was under the impression that, with my full paragon Shepard imported from the second game, all those blue options would be available for me throughout this game.


But then again, I always knew one thing, though I did not want to admit it. If people were complaining about a bad ending, then Shepard probably died, along with a lot if not all his squad. But then again, I always knew that my full paragon and choices made earlier would probably get me something better. However, I guess all Mass Effect players knew going into the final game that, they had to sacrifice a lot, because the Harbinger wasn't going to play nice with anybody.


So back to actually playing the game. I enjoyed every moment. I didn't like how Mordin died, but then again, his sacrifice cured the genophage and that was great. I always considered Urdnot Wrex a great ally and friend throughout the series. I was under the impression that Thane would be cured in the game, but then again, the guy was dying. When he died, I really did hope that would be the last death I would see in the game. However, Legion was next. But that got the Quarians and Geth to work together, and that added to my 'total war assets', which I didn't really understand at this point.

So I did some digging. Apparently, in order to get the 'best' ending (the best ending was still horrible), I had to have an Effective military strength of more than 5000. And how do I do that? Play multiplayer. Bioware, that was mistake number one. Why in the world should a single player storyline be effected by multiplayer? What about the people who don't have the internet, or don't like the multiplayer at all? It was a bad decision on every level, and I really hope they fix it.

But then again, this wasn't a big problem for me either, since I played the multiplayer demo and kicked ass. In fact, I enjoyed multiplayer. Therefore, before I went ahead to assault the Cerberus base, I had an effective military strength of more than 6500. OHHH YEAAHHH!

But wait! As I was watching the ending sequence at 5 am, I was very VERY confused. Who the fuck is this God-child, and what's he doing here? WHERE ARE MY PARAGON INTERRUPTS? Now, this kid tells me this:



But I JUST allied the damn Geth and Quarians, and they are fighting your Reapers! The God-child vaguely explains three options to me. The first one, or the Red Choice, 'Destroy'. It's where you destroy all synthetic life, along with the reapers. Depending on your Effective Military Strength, Earth may be destroyed or saved in the process. And there was the Blue Choice, or Control. This was exactly what The Illusive Man wanted to do. Control the reapers. However, this was never something I wanted to do. I didn't believe that MY Shepard would even consider that option. But this option apparently would kill Shepard. And then there was the third option. Synthesis. Combine synthetics and organics and let's live happily ever after. Well fuck that shit because I'm not Saren either. This option would kill Shepard as well. Therefore, I decided I only came here to kill the reapers, and even if it would destroy the Geth and EDI, I had to do it.


But wait! No matter what option you choose, all the Mass Relays get destroyed! I will get to that in a second. And so, I choose the Destroy option, and watch as the Crucible kicks in, and wipes out the Reapers. Soldiers were celebrating on Earth. And THEN I see the Normandy fleeing from this huge red/orange explosion, with Joker pressing every button on the ship (it was hilarious really). But then, the explosion takes out the Normandy's engines and the scene changes to some random planet. The Normandy has crash landed, Joker opens the door, and out steps Liara (My LI) and Garrus. These two I brought to the final fight. What the fuck were they doing, running away? At this stage, I was really confused. So with the Mass Relays gone, all the galaxy's species were stuck on Earth?


And suddenly, a new scene appears. Under lots of rubble, there's Commander Shepard, his N7 tags visible. And he breathes! The end.



Wait...no. How is THAT the end? What about the species back on Earth? How did the Normandy end up on that planet? Who was the God-child? And how did Shepard survive the Citadel exploding? And why didn't the Mass Relay take out the Solar system? What happened to my little blue children? Technically.....shouldn't every single person be dead?


Apparently, this was it. Mass Effect 3 was over. I will skip the ending scene with the old man and the child. It's irrelevant in my opinion. I just couldn't believe that every single decision I made over 3 games, over more than a 100 hours of gameplay and buying the majority of DLC's had no real effect over how the game ended. It felt incomplete, and didn't feel like Mass Effect at all. I didn't want to replay the game, because no matter what, it all came down to three similar endings with three different colours. No seriously, that was pretty much the only difference. This was when I joined the retake group, and went deeper into what people thought about the endings on Bioware's Social Network. People had come up with the Indoctrination Theory, that Shep was dreaming throughout. I don't really know what to make out of the theory, but what stands is that Bioware screwed up. Big time. Their co-founder released a statement due to the outrage by fans, but it was very vague. Not much information about anything, except that they were listening.

Mass Effect 3 was overall a great game. But the ending ruins it all. Tali's googled stock photo was funny when I learned about it on Youtube. It's really hard to believe that after everything which happened in the ME universe, that it would all come down to three colours and that's excluding major plotholes in the endings. And this, after everything Bioware said prior to the release. I would love to blame EA though. However, I'm just going to wait until PAX this April to find out what Bioware has to say. They need to fix the endings, and do right by their fans. Until then, no replaying or DLC's for me. Oh and also, IGN is such a disgrace.

Disregard this post. I'm testing something :D

This is not a long post. Why? Because there is not much explanation needed to as why Step Up 3D was one of the most horrible dance movies to be ever created.

Now, I am not so sure why a lot of people actually LIKE the third installment of the Step Up movies. I watched it sometime ago, and I just kept on seeing Step Up 3D being made a part of "favourite movies" on facebook by...random people I know.

I liked the first two movies. They were great. But this one....was absolute BULLSHIT! So, if you wanted to create a dance movie, why does it ALWAYS have to be where the dance group needs money to "survive" a particular disaster...while there is some sort of arch enemy lurking in the background (to be met at the final dance off). And in the middle, throw in some cheesy lines, horrible acting, forced romance ("Rule number one in getting a girl inside a random club: Follow her around with a camera" - Courtesy of Step Up 3D)

All that happened. If this movie wasn't 3D, how much money would it have really made? Now it comes to the final battle. Yeah, usually these final battles are....VERY AWESOME. Like in the second movie. However, in this one....it was almost as if their opponents didn't exist. And oh yeah, the moment the competition was mentioned in the movie (where they would win a 100,000)....we all knew they would win hands down....and go home with the money to save their home...which by the way, could have only been built if these dancers actually had jobs...or if the main actor called Luke earned a LOT. But they didn't.

The final dance with the fancy lights was....good, but it would have been better IF the opponents actually had something spectacular as well. But did they? No...they looked like people who should have had a tough time getting around other rounds of the competition.

The only good aspect to the movie was the dude named Moose. He could act. Everybody else couldn't Fact.